Author
Iffanna Fitrotul Aaidati(1
),
(1) , Indonesia
Corresponding Author
| Article Analytic |
Available online: 2024-07-30 | Published : 2024-07-30
Copyright (c) 2024 Iffanna Fitrotul Aaidati
Article can trace at:
Article Metrics
Abstract Views: 0 times
PDF Downloaded: 0 times
Abstract
Pada saat menyelesaikan masalah kovariasi, mahasiswa menyusun argumentasi pada proses penalaran, sehingga evaluasi penalaran kovariasional dapat dilakukan dengan menganalisis struktur argumentasi. Adapun kemampuan seseorang untuk mengatasi dan menyelesaikan suatu permasalahan disebut adversity quotient. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan struktur argumentasi mahasiswa dengan adversity quotient kategori climber saat menyelesaikan masalah kovariasi. Penentuan kategori adversity quotient menggunakan angket ARP (Adversity Respons Profile), kemudian struktur argumentasi dianalisis melalui tes dan wawancara. Subjek pada penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Semester 2 Tahun Akademik 2023/2024 yang sedang mengambil mata kuliah Kalkulus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa struktur argumentasi mahasiswa dengan Adversity Quotient kategori climber dalam menyelesaikan masalah kovariasi yaitu, pada komponen evidence memberikan data akurat dan lengkap yang bersumber dari informasi dan fakta masalah kovariasi, pada komponen claim memberikan pernyataan grafis dan verbal yang melibatkan pemahaman tentang konsep jumlah perubahan satu kuantitas terhadap kuantitas lainnya, pada komponen reasoning melakukan penalaran secara imitatif saat menghubungkan data dengan claim, dan pada komponen rebuttal memberikan claim alternatif dari jawaban benar yang didukung dengan data dan alasan sesuai fakta permasalahan.
Keywords
References
Aaidati, I.F. 2022. Struktur Argumentasi Mahasiswa pada Penalaran Kovariasional Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient. Tesis (tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Negeri Malang
Aaidati, I. F., Subanji, Sulandra, I. M., Permadi, H. 2022. Student argumentation structure in solving statistical problems based on adversity quotient. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(2), 121-140.
Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. 2015. The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958
Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. 2010. A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20402
Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. 2002. Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
Carlson, M., Larsen, S., & Lesh, R. 2003. Integrating a models and modeling perspective with existing research and practice. Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching., 1998, 465–478. http://math.clas.asu.edu/~carlson/chap25.pdf
Carlson, M., Oehrtman, M., & Engelke, N. 2010. The precalculus concept assessment: A tool for assessing students’ reasoning abilities and understandings. Cognition and Instruction, 28(1), 113–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370001003676587
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. 1994. Exponential functions, rates of change, and the multiplicative unit. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2–3), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273661
Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D. T. 2008. Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701411567
Faizah, L., Probosari, R. M., & Karyanto, P. 2018. Penerapan Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Lisan Siswa Kelas XI pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Biotek, 6(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/jb.v6i2.6395
Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. 2014. Individual versus group argumentation: Student’s performance in a Malaysian context. International Education Studies, 7(7), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p109
Hidayat, W., Herdiman, I., Aripin, U., Yuliani, A., & Maya, R. 2018. Adversity Quotient (AQ) dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Jurnal Elemen, 4(2), 230. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v4i2.701
Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. 2018. The mathematical argumentation ability and adversity quotient (AQ) of pre-service mathematics teacher. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 239–248.
Johnson, H. L. 2012. Reasoning about variation in the intensity of change in covarying quantities involved in rate of change. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(3), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.01.001
Laamena, C. M., Nusantara, T., Irawan, E. B., & Muksar, M. 2018. Analysis of the Students’ Argumentation based on the level of Ability: Study on the Process of Mathematical Proof. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012156
Lithner, J. 2008. A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
Mcneill, B. K. L., & Martin, D. M. 2011. Demystifying data during a unit on simple machines. National Research Council (NRC 1996).
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. 2009. Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain-specific and domain-general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 416–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903013488
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. 2011. Supporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanation in science. London, UK: Pearson. Diakses melalui https://eric.ed.gov
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. 2006. Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
Muratsu, K., Inagaki, S., Yamaguchi, E., Yamamoto, T., Sakamoto, M., & Kamiyama, S. 2015. An Evaluation of Japanese Elementary Students’ Understanding of the Criteria for Rebuttals in Argumentation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167(2010), 91–95.
Nordin, A. K., & Björklund, B. L. 2018. A framework for identifying mathematical arguments as supported claims created in day-to-day classroom interactions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.06.005
Pallant, A., & Lee, H. S. 2015. Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3
Şen Zeytun, A., Çetinkaya, B., & Erbaş, A. K. 2010. Mathematics teachers’ covariational reasoning levels and predictions about students’ covariational reasoning abilities. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 10(3), 1601–1612.
Septiana, A. 2019. Tingkat Adversity Quotient Matematis pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Tadris Matematika IAIN Curup. Academic Journal of Math, 01(01), 51–62. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/ja.v1i1.826
Stoltz, G. P. 1997. Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
Subanji. 2011. Teori berpikir pseudo penalaran kovariasional. Malang: UM Press.
Sutini, S., Aaidati, I. F., & Kusaeri, K. 2020. Identifying the structure of students’ argumentation in covariational reasoning of constructing graphs. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 13(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v13i1.374
Thompson, P. W., &Carlson, M. P. 2017. Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421-456). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Umah, U., Sulandra, I. M., & Asari, A. R. 2014. Penalaran Kovariasional Siswa Kelas VIIIB MTs Negeri Kediri 1 dalam Mengonstruk Grafik Fungsi. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294259258
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
